Twelve-month term
A defined evaluation window with review gates, measurable targets, and a written transition plan.
A practical path forward
A verified community petition asking Blizzard Entertainment and Xbox to evaluate a controlled, licensed Project Ascension pilot.
The permanent campaign would count a signature only after email verification. This preview is a safe, non-collecting demonstration.
The petition
We are asking Blizzard Entertainment and Xbox to evaluate whether Project Ascension can operate under a limited agreement that protects Warcraft intellectual property, compensates the rights holder, and measures actual player demand.
To the leadership of Blizzard Entertainment and Xbox:
Project Ascension has built a large community around a distinct way of experiencing a familiar game world. The current lawsuit may decide legal claims, but litigation alone cannot measure whether a licensed version could create lasting value for players and the Warcraft business.
We respectfully ask you to:
A pilot creates evidence. It can test player demand, technical compliance, brand safeguards, subscription effects, and revenue potential before either side makes a permanent commitment.
Production launch: typed signature, confirmed email, country, and age authorization.
The proposal
The campaign is asking for a structured commercial test, with terms Blizzard and Xbox can audit and enforce.
A defined evaluation window with review gates, measurable targets, and a written transition plan.
An initial 50,000 or 100,000-player cap, expandable only after compliance and performance review.
A WoW subscription requirement, a hypothetical add-on, a revenue share, or another negotiated model.
Approved naming, clear independence disclosures, authorized distribution, and limits on protected material.
Reporting, privacy standards, security review, financial audits, and a documented chain-of-title inventory.
Defined termination triggers, player communication rules, data handling, and a continuity or wind-down process.
Transparent measurement
These figures are placeholders used to demonstrate the public dashboard. They are not petition results and should never be presented as real signatures or verified player intent.
Scenario calculator
Adjust the audience and intent assumptions. The model separates incremental WoW subscription revenue from a hypothetical Ascension add-on, then discounts stated interest with conservative realization rates.
Prices are before applicable taxes. Regional pricing and longer-term subscription discounts may differ. Blizzard has not approved this add-on or pilot.
Gross revenue before platform costs, taxes, royalties, support, development, refunds, and cannibalization. The two lines measure distinct products: incremental WoW subscriptions and the add-on.
Signature integrity
A credible petition should show Blizzard exactly what each number represents, how duplicates are handled, and where uncertainty remains.
Name, email, country, and age authorization. No free-form public comment field.
A one-time email link confirms the address before the signature counts.
Four optional questions separate general support from player and purchase intent.
Publish submitted, verified, surveyed, excluded, and removed totals separately.
Questions and safeguards
This campaign is public advocacy. It supports a negotiated path while keeping the lawsuit, the petition, and any future commercial agreement clearly separate.
No. It is an independent community petition and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by Blizzard Entertainment, Xbox, Microsoft, Project Ascension, Derek Powell, or any defendant.
No. The preview demonstrates the experience in your browser. It sends no form data, creates no account, and stores no personal information.
The smallest useful set: a typed name, email address, country or region, age authorization, verification status, and optional multiple-choice intent answers. Public reporting would use aggregate totals.
A production launch would include a verified removal link and a documented privacy request process. Removed and excluded signatures would remain visible only as aggregate audit totals.
Blizzard's complaint contains allegations. The court has not decided the merits. The petition expresses a policy and business proposal; it does not claim to represent a party or provide legal advice.
Lawful, respectful public advocacy. Do not threaten, harass, dox, brigade, or publish private information about anyone involved in the dispute.
The ask is simple